Parliamentary democracy in action – the return of Michael Ignatieff

Posted December 1, 2008 on 3:14 pm | In the category 2008, Canada, Election 2008, Uncategorized | by Mackenzie Brothers

A couple of years ago, my brother Doug and I predicted that the next Prime Minister of Canada could be a very high level intellectual and genetic aristocrat, (his grandfather was the last minister of education in tsarist Russia) Harvard guru, BBC talk show star and prize-winning author (for both fiction and non-fiction) Michael Ignatieff, returning from years of voluntary exile to show Canada how to do it. We were wrong in the short run. Ignatieff ran into too much resistance in his own party because he had been away for too long, and failed to win the party leadership position. Instead he settled for second place behind compromise candidate Stephane Dion, who then went on to fail miserably in the election that followed only one month ago. But Ignatieff did win a seat in parliament, became deputy leader and put in his time in the trenches. And now it seems that we will be right in the slightly longer run as a singularly uncanadian (unprecedented in great white north history) event seems destined to take place within a week.
Prime Minister Steven Harper, having set up a minority government with only about 1/3 of the vote, amazingly failed to note that he was not in a strong position of power and had to rule with the opposition in mind. With breathless arrogance he announced a political programme in his first act of power in the new session, that failed to address the economic crisis but did include a number of issues that were unacceptable to the socialist, liberal and separatist opposition parties. The result was the seemingly impossible agreement of the 3 opposition parties to vote against the ruling conservatives in the vote of confidence that goes with such a government bill, and thus bring down the government and state that the opposition parties were ready to rule in coalition. Such a coup d’état by parliamentary means may be familiar to Italians, Austrians and others but it is unheard of in supposedly stable Canada, and has many flocks of geese flapping around wildly. But it does seem now that it will happen within two weeks, and either Stephan Dion, who has already said he will step down as party leader in May, or heir-apparent Michael Ignatieff will be catapulted into power. Ignatieff and Obama would be an interesting pair as Ignatief sometimes pops up to the right of Obama on key issues, such as the invasion of Iraq that Ignatief as head of the appropriate Harvard Institute showed sympathy for because of the Iraqi government’s history of war crimes against the Kurds.

2 Comments

2 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. South of the 49th we prefer our elections to last forever and to consist of fatuous claims, mud-slinging and bizarre analyses by TV blowhards who declare that one candidate is approaching senility and the other an undercover terrorist.

    A process as described by Bob Mackenzie is simply unfathomable to us. How could the Canadians actually get rid of a mediocrity like Harper in such a wonderfully short period of time? Why couldn’t we get rid of G. Bush even at the four year mark? (i know the answer to the last part of the question but think it best to avoid insulting my fellow citizens).

    Well, let’s see what actually happens in Canada. A report in yesterday’s NY Times suggests a possibility that Canada’s Governor General, Michaëlle Jean, will be asked to end the current session of Parliament before its expected no confidence vote scheduled for early next week. According to the Times, this would apparently allow Harper to continue to govern for a full year without calling the House of Commons back to work. G. Bush would have loved to have that possibility since losing control of Congress in 2006. Of course he might be less pleased to have the decision in the hands of someone representing the Queen of England – something we got rid of in 1775.

    It is an interesting spectacle for those of us unaware of how the political process works for our friendly neighbors to the North. For the little that it is worth, it appears to this observer that replacing Mr. Harper with Mr. Dion would be much less interesting than getting Mr. Ignatief in the position. As for his support for the Iraq invasion i would only quote his own comments in a 2007 NY Times piece: “The unfolding catastrophe in Iraq has condemned the political judgment of a president, but it has also condemned the judgment of many others, myself included, who as commentators supported the invasion.” Making a mistake is human, admitting it is unheard of in American politics. Good on him!

    Comment by jeff — December 4, 2008 #

  2. Well, Ms. Michaëlle Jean has represented the Queen in style and force. As of this morning Harper is saved at least till late January and the majority of voters in Canada are treated the way they were in the U.S. in the 2000 election.

    Comment by jeff — December 4, 2008 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^