The Supreme Court as a Legion of Decency
Posted May 13, 2009 on 5:43 pm | In the category Free Speech, Supreme Copurt, U.S. Domestic Policy | by JeffThe current U.S. Supreme Court has distinguished itself as an activist handmaiden of the Christian religious right. Two recent decisions illustrate the nuttiness that might have contributed to the retirement of Judge Souter and led many observers to wonder how in the devil we allowed such a takeover of one of our most important institutions. Both decisions relate to the efforts of the former chairman of the FCC to protect our tender eyes and ears from certain kinds of words and sights. One case involved the FCC’s policy to fine TV and radio stations for allowing “fleeting expletives” to go out on the airways. So if a sportscaster goes into a locker room and – shocking as it may seem – a professional athlete should refer to a loss as a “fuckin disaster” the broadcaster is liable to receive a sizable fine. Similarly, if a rock star wins a Grammy and accepts it in a live broadcast with the words, “fuckin awesome” the same holds. This FCC policy is apparently the brainchild of former FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, an absolutist when it comes to the FCC’s right to determine what we can and cannot hear and see. The other case, of course, is the infamous half-second display of Janet Jackson’s left (or was it the right?) nipple during the Superbowl halftime extravaganza. The FCC fined CBS TV over $500,000 for that incident and surely the morals of American youth have not yet recovered. In any case the fine was overturned in a lower court and now the Supreme Court has sent it back to be reconsidered.
None of this would matter all that much if it were not emblematic of a right-wing activist court bent on controlling our lives in ways that are silly but nonetheless disturbing. Which brings us to the retirement of Justice Souter and the immediate response of Republican Senators that President Obama must not appoint anyone who might just possibly bring a modicum of sanity to a court populated with a majority of right-wingers who have done all possible to further the narrow ideology promoted by right-wing Christians. This before Obama has even mentioned possible names. What we are in for is a time wasting, grandstanding display of ignorance and hypocritical piety by Republican Senators who will carry the water of the likes of Pat Robertson and Pope Benedict. This in a country founded on the basis of separation of Church and State.
The complaints from the right will focus on what they contend are the evils of “activist” judges, (conveniently forgetting that the court has been – in their word, “activist,” for a number of years in the promotion of THEIR agenda), now defined as any judge who decides cases differently from what their religious beliefs would dictate. The political make-up of the Senate makes it likely that the Christian right will not prevail in the upcoming battle for the integrity of the Supreme Court but they will certainly make some of us scream for sanity.
2 Comments2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
Jeff forgot to mention one of the odder facets of the current appointment process . One of the leading candidates is said to be Michigan Governor Jessica Granholm, an honors graduate of both the University of California at Berkeley and Harvard Law School, an academic background that automatically makes her a devil to Jeff’s Legion of Decency. Because she was born in Vancouver, British Columbia, and only moved to the US when she was in diapers, the guardians are now trying to block her because she was not native-born, a stipulation in the US Constitution for the President (Tell that to Arnold Schwarzenegger!), but not for the Supreme Court. Nevertheless no foreign-born judge has sat there since Felix Frankfurter, suggesting that the must be strong evidence that those bediapered months abroad smell anti-USian.
Comment by Mackenzie Brothers — May 14, 2009 #
First of all, her name is Jennifer, not Jessica – time to cut down on the beer, boys. And she has a lot going against her besides her birthplace. I mean a Canadian judge? Cripes, she would be endlessly seeking the middle ground. Plus– she got degrees form Berkeley and Harvard; is a failed actress; won a third-rate (compared to Sarah Palin’s first rate) beauty contest; did not try for American citizenship until she had been in the country 17 years; kept her maiden – whoops, I mean “birth” – name when she married; competed in TV’s Dating Game, and defeated the son of the founder of Amway – a great American institution – in her re-election. But worst of all, she is of Scandinavian descent – and the last thing we would want would be someone with Swedish and Norwegian genes pulsing through her brain as she decides issues with potential socialistic implications.
Comment by jeff — May 14, 2009 #