<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proroguing &#8211; a new Canadian tradition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicsandpress.com/2010/proroguing-a-new-canadian-tradition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2010/proroguing-a-new-canadian-tradition/</link>
	<description>The interaction of the press and politics; public diplomacy, and daily absurdities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2010/proroguing-a-new-canadian-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-14636</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/?p=408#comment-14636</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t I recall the the Governor General (or whatever she&#039;s called) has to approve this proroguing business?  Surely she can&#039;t have made the same stupid decision two years in a row.  Is there a time limit on this nonsense? Or can he just &quot;prorogue&quot; in perpetuity?
Jeff&#039;s right; the institution of the filibuster down here gives proroguing a run for its money when it comes to ridiculous, anti-democratic features of our ostensibly democratic governments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t I recall the the Governor General (or whatever she&#8217;s called) has to approve this proroguing business?  Surely she can&#8217;t have made the same stupid decision two years in a row.  Is there a time limit on this nonsense? Or can he just &#8220;prorogue&#8221; in perpetuity?<br />
Jeff&#8217;s right; the institution of the filibuster down here gives proroguing a run for its money when it comes to ridiculous, anti-democratic features of our ostensibly democratic governments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2010/proroguing-a-new-canadian-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-14634</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/?p=408#comment-14634</guid>
		<description>We are just coming out of our bomb shelters down South of you - scared spitless by Dick Cheney and the Amurcan press which spent the last couple weeks reminding us that we are all at risk but refusing to accept the fact that we are - yes - all at risk. Anyway I am tickled to hear of the U.S. youngsters showing some gumption up there in Saskatoon which Sarah Palin thinks she can see from Alaska.

As for proroguing, we&#039;ll match your bet with our Senate filibuster, a uniquely Amurcan way to turn a democracy into a dysfunctional banana republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are just coming out of our bomb shelters down South of you &#8211; scared spitless by Dick Cheney and the Amurcan press which spent the last couple weeks reminding us that we are all at risk but refusing to accept the fact that we are &#8211; yes &#8211; all at risk. Anyway I am tickled to hear of the U.S. youngsters showing some gumption up there in Saskatoon which Sarah Palin thinks she can see from Alaska.</p>
<p>As for proroguing, we&#8217;ll match your bet with our Senate filibuster, a uniquely Amurcan way to turn a democracy into a dysfunctional banana republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

