<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politics and Press</title>
	<link>http://politicsandpress.com</link>
	<description>The interaction of the press and politics; public diplomacy, and daily absurdities.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>A tale of two elections - Part 2</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Brothers</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Canada</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     Among the many interesting but not earthshaking side effects of the Obama election is an overdue tempering of a kind of understood superiority that had taken over the Canadian view of their way of governing when compared to that of the US for the last decade.  After all about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     Among the many interesting but not earthshaking side effects of the Obama election is an overdue tempering of a kind of understood superiority that had taken over the Canadian view of their way of governing when compared to that of the US for the last decade.  After all about ten years ago, US politics was completely dominated by a grotesquely overblown miserable little sex scandal of the old kind that ruined the final years of an otherwise apparently more than capable president, only to be followed by a most curious piece of vote counting that brought to power an obviously incapable president who was even re-elected.  During the same period Canada was governed by a series of mediocre leaders who made everyone wish for just a touch of the intelligence, charm and cold determination of Pierre Elliot Trudeau.  But when the same people looked south, it was clear that Ottawa was a centre of charisma and excellence when compared to whoever was sitting in the White House. </p>
<p>     It may well turn out that Barack Obama will not be able to fulfill the great hopes that have inevitably been placed on him (probably nobody could), but he&#8217;s already done a great deal just by winning this election.  Now the world can stop dumping on the Americans for not even being able to run their own fair elections while telling every one else to become democratic, and Canadian commentators can stop preaching to them about their lack of benevolence towards the downtrodden, while ignoring the often scandalous state of their own aboriginal communities.  Because while the Americans, against all odds, voted for someone named Barack Obama to be their leader, a smaller percentage of eligible Canadian voters confirmed, in the most boring election in memory, the re-election of a prime minister whose name they could scarcely remember after his first term in office.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of Two Elections</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Brothers</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
	<category>Canada</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
	<category>Election 2008</category>
	<category>McCain</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     The Canadian election was called 6 weeks before the vote on Oct. 14. the day after Thanksgiving, and has provided journalists and media types with plenty of largely vacuous material to keep them employed for the period.  Among the specialties of the Canadian six-weeks are the two debates among [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     The Canadian election was called 6 weeks before the vote on Oct. 14. the day after Thanksgiving, and has provided journalists and media types with plenty of largely vacuous material to keep them employed for the period.  Among the specialties of the Canadian six-weeks are the two debates among the now 5 major party leaders, one of whose parties has never had anyone elected, first in French and one night later in English.  The spectacle of 3 native English-speakers attempting to use their various levels of high-school French (from pretty primitive to B plus) to outargue two very smart native French speakers provides a certain amount of sadistic humour, but wears thin after 15 grueling minutes.  And then vice versa on the next evening, since amazingly none of these five leaders is as bilingual as thousands of kids attending French  schools in Vancouver, not to mention many scores of thousand bilingual Chinese speakers.  In the long run, it seems clear that this election, despite all its energy and windbag rhetoric, will not change the makeup of parliament very much at all, and there will be another minority government.  </p>
<p>      The US  election with a set date, on the other hand, has gone on seemingly forever and cost scores (hundreds?) of millions of dollars, something which does not seem to have been mentioned in the current financial crisis, where that money might have been used for something more useful, like hiring more inspectors and controllers of financial institutions.  But for all its own brand of windbagging rhetoric, a huckstering media performance, and sideshow shenanigans like a vice-presidential debate, the US system does allow the main candidates to give some indication of what they are really made of, something hard to argue for the Canadian system.  It is an exhausting process and a youngster like Obama should have a real advantage over an old warrior like McCain, but the old soldier seems to be hanging in there quite admirably and ultimately the vote should come down to which of the two convinces more people of the superiority of their view of the world, assuming they put functioning ballot boxes in states like Ohio and Florida, and that the Palin fiasco doesn&#8217;t lead to comicall voting patterns.  You&#8217;d have to be gambler to bet against Obama but at least the game seems to have been played on a  level field.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/a-tale-of-two-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do economists do, anyway?</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/what-do-economists-do-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/what-do-economists-do-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Brothers</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Economy</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/what-do-economists-do-anyway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[      Okay so the economy of the world is going to Disneyland because the economists advising the US government  on how to regulate the flow of money apparently don&#8217;t know their ass from their elbow.  Or are they simply in cahoots with the CEOS who got millions of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>      Okay so the economy of the world is going to Disneyland because the economists advising the US government  on how to regulate the flow of money apparently don&#8217;t know their ass from their elbow.  Or are they simply in cahoots with the CEOS who got millions of dollars for having bankrupted their firms on their watch? Or could it just be total incompetence, or the display of the emperor&#8217;s new economic expertise clothes?  Should they be forced to read Hans Christian Andersen stories, instead of economic comic books? After all George Bush has an MBA from Harvard, the same super-elite US university that Canadians, who have regulated their banking system so this can&#8217;t happen, call America&#8217;s McGill.  And he certainly doesn&#8217;t know anything about the topic.  Why drag down McGill&#8217;s reputation?  My real question is therefore:  What the hell do economists do if they know buggerall about economics?  Couldn&#8217;t we save a lot of it by just getting rid of this profession?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/what-do-economists-do-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ON THE NEW U.S. ECONOMY</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/on-the-new-us-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/on-the-new-us-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Economy</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
	<category>The Bush Watch</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/on-the-new-us-economy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.   &#8211;   John Maynard Keynes
As the U.S. economy falters due largely to lending practices that at best were idiotic and unethical and at worst illegal, the government has decided it needed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.   &#8211;   John Maynard Keynes</p></blockquote>
<p>As the U.S. economy falters due largely to lending practices that at best were idiotic and unethical and at worst illegal, the government has decided it needed to step in, and has done so at a potential cost of $700 billion. While not as much as the Iraq War has cost surely this must cement George W. Bush’s reputation as the worst American president of all time. This in spite of the inevitable stories in the press seeking to find good things to say about him as his administration slowly, ever so slowly, sinks below the surface.</p>
<p>The following are responses to the government’s bail out project from two of Politicsandpress’s correspondents.</p>
<p>Item from our European Correspondent:</p>
<p>“Hey, hey Ben + Hank finally came up with the plan to end the “turmoil”.  Of course it involves having our grandchildren repay the Chinese who will fund it.  It really is better than the previous final solution of getting all the worlds central banks to “inject” $180b into “the economy”. That was a good one.  Some pundit summed it up for me: ”Having discovered that the brakes don’t work the bankers have supplied the car with a louder horn.”  But this new one that Ben + Hank are going to “…work ALL WEEKEND perfecting” (the sacrifices these men make for us) is the one our grandchildren will pay for.</p>
<p>As I understand it from the press its premise is:<br />
“…a comprehensive approach to address the illiquid assets on bank balance sheets that are &#8230; the underlying source of the current stresses in our financial institutions and financial markets.&#8221; (And all this time I thought the underlying problem was that Amercuns weren’t repaying their debts.)</p>
<p>Anyway, the way this will work is:<br />
“…the new [taxpayer of the future] entity would &#8220;purchase assets at a steep discount from solvent financial institutions and then eventually sell them back into the market&#8221; through an auction.”</p>
<p>Cool.  Buy stuff that is worth nothing (a debt that won’t/can’t be repaid) and later sell at a tooth fairy auction.  Ben + Hank expecting to make money on this?  Break even?  Non-inflationary? They’re not even bothering to tell those lies.</p>
<p>So anyway, anyway, I am all for it cause it kicks the can down the road to a point after which I will have kicked the can.</p>
<p>Washington, DC responds:<br />
The &#8220;market&#8221; just loves kicking the can.  Investments go bad due to the ingenuity of the greedy little men in the world of finance [and the ignorance of the man of the street] with a large helping of gumm&#8217;t indifference - and oh yeah add the disastrous balance of trade - and the result is a $500, or is it a $800, billion bailout by our grandkids - ain&#8217;t capitalism wonderful?  I&#8217;m hoping this will put a stop to the religious fervor of the followers of Milton Freedman and his laissez faire capitalism - well, that is too much to hope methinks, how about putting a dent in it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/on-the-new-us-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>West to Alaska - the Globe looks at Gov. Palin</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/west-to-alaska-the-globe-looks-at-gov-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/west-to-alaska-the-globe-looks-at-gov-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Brothers</dc:creator>
		
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
	<category>Election</category>
	<category>Election 2008</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/west-to-alaska-the-globe-looks-at-gov-palin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With 100% credit to the Toronto Globe and Mail&#8217;s resident poet John Allemang
PALIN COUNTRY
Please call us rednecks, &#8217;cause we&#8217;re proud
To be so rough  and rude and loud,
And act in ways elitists think
Proves that we&#8217;ve had too much  to drink
In some dead-end Alaska dive
When, dude, it just shows we&#8217;re alive.
We love our church, our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 100% credit to the Toronto Globe and Mail&#8217;s resident poet John Allemang</p>
<p>PALIN COUNTRY</p>
<p>Please call us rednecks, &#8217;cause we&#8217;re proud<br />
To be so rough  and rude and loud,<br />
And act in ways elitists think<br />
Proves that we&#8217;ve had too much  to drink<br />
In some dead-end Alaska dive<br />
When, dude, it just shows we&#8217;re alive.<br />
We love our church, our kids, our beer,<br />
Can tell you right down to the year<br />
That God put Man upon the Earth,<br />
Know life starts well ahead of birth,<br />
Don&#8217;t give a damn about the arts<br />
And stay away from foreign parts<br />
Until the moment that we&#8217;re sent<br />
As John McCain&#8217;s vice-president</p>
<p>The great thing, when your neck is red?<br />
Nobody cares what&#8217;s in your head -<br />
The voters seem to like &#8216;em dumb,<br />
So why not play a hockey mom<br />
Who hunts and prays and procreates<br />
To govern these Unites States?<br />
If you can drive a snowmobile,<br />
The people, bless them, think you&#8217;re real,<br />
And in the end who needs a brain?<br />
Just tell your kids they must abstain,<br />
Pretend that when your rule&#8217;s ignored<br />
It&#8217;s some great gift sent by the Lord,<br />
And prove you&#8217;ll go to any length<br />
To make such redneck fault a strength.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/west-to-alaska-the-globe-looks-at-gov-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California burning</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/california-burning/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/california-burning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Brothers</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
	<category>Environment</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/california-burning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     There is no shred of good coming from the out of control fires up and down the coast and in the northern mountains of California, except that there are still many courageous and daring firefighters willing to take on the filthy and dangerous business of trying to control them.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     There is no shred of good coming from the out of control fires up and down the coast and in the northern mountains of California, except that there are still many courageous and daring firefighters willing to take on the filthy and dangerous business of trying to control them.  So far it has been a torturously futile attempt as lightning strikes start new fires long before the worst of the old ones are contained.  For anyone who has spent time in places like the Yolla Bolly or Trinity Alps mountain preserves or the wilderness area east of Big Sur (not to mention easily accessible Big Sur itself), as my brother and I often have, it is a tragically sad spectacle to see these beautiful places being destroyed for at least many decades.  For as natural as lightning burns have always been, bringing in long-lasting good with the temporary bad, these fires seem different.  They are way too early, they are happening because there has been no rain in many parts of central and northern california since the winter, and there is not enough available water to fight them in a co-ordinated way.  </p>
<p>     These are the canaries in the coal mine of climate change and big, beautiful (for the most part) California is surely one of the most vulnerable places on earth as much of it has been built in almost desert-like locations which must import water to sustain life on the scale that has been placed there.  And water is what California does not have enough of, particularly southern California and especially the megalopolis of San Diego to Santa Barbara.  For decades the waters of northern California and the diverted Colorado River have kept these places water-solvent but that time is coming to or has already reached an end.  20% of the California budget is devoted to pumping the waters of the north to the south, especially from the Sacramento River delta, whose dikes are now considered under a greater threat than were those of New Orleans before they  broke.  If the salt water of San Francisco Bay breaks through into the fresh water of the delta, the nightmare scenario, it is hard to imagine the future of Los Angeles.  It is in any case hard to imagine how a life style pushing rice field agriculture, green lawns, swimming pools and golf courses can be tolerated,as it should be perfectly clear by now that water is the most valuable of all commodities for life - gas is incomparably less important - and that in southern California it is being wasted in an intolerable fashion.  There are no replacements - the Colorado River is being siphoned dry by all the states it runs through. Neither Oregon nor Washington have any water they are going to spare for their wasteful southern neighbours, and it is against the law to export water from water-rich Canada, even if it were so inclined.  San Diego is now setting up desalinization pilot projects, but this process causes many problems of its own and cannot solve the basic one - much more water is being used than is available.  Perhaps Governor Arnie, who seems to have a good understanding of the problem, can convince some of those professors at his best universities to come to grips somehow with this really existential problem..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/california-burning/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama speaks at  Wesleyan as Belichick joins Hall of Fame - Sports and Politics, part 3</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/obama-speaks-at-wesleyan-as-belichick-joins-hall-of-fame-sports-and-politics-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/obama-speaks-at-wesleyan-as-belichick-joins-hall-of-fame-sports-and-politics-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 06:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie Brothers</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
	<category>Politics</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
	<category>Election 2008</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/obama-speaks-at-wesleyan-as-belichick-joins-hall-of-fame-sports-and-politics-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    Just when it seemed that the US Democratic primary campaign was going to sink into the quicksand of complete disinterest, Barack Obama has made a deft move that is sure to focus attention on more interesting topics than the exact delegate vote not including Michigan, American Samoa, the Virgins Islands and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    Just when it seemed that the US Democratic primary campaign was going to sink into the quicksand of complete disinterest, Barack Obama has made a deft move that is sure to focus attention on more interesting topics than the exact delegate vote not including Michigan, American Samoa, the Virgins Islands and Florida.  My brother and I, lost in the snows of the tundra, haven&#8217;t been able to grasp the nuances of that mathematical formula.  What we have figured out is that Middletown, Connecticut will be the centre of world attention this afternoon as Obama steps in in relief of his stricken brother-in-arms Ted Kennedy, who will be sitting in the first row as his stepdaughter graduates from one of the premier US East coast elite liberal Arts universities and his son celebrates the 15th anniversary of his graduation.  But Wesleyan is also probably the premier elite small university in another area: sports, and my brother Doug thinks that Obama is hoping to gain stature by being in the presence of some of the heroic figures who are already in the Wesleyan Hall of Fame as Bill Belichick joins it along with legendary marathon runner Bill Rodgers.</p>
<p>    But it is not only Rogers and Belichick, the winner of four Super Bowls with the New England Patriots and the most successful football coach in recent NFL history, who will be present, but also former Wesleyan student and current arch Belichick nemesis Coach Eric Mangini of NFL&#8217;s New York Jets, who will be there for his fifteenth reunion.   For Wesleyan is the only university to have produced two current NFL coaches, and Doug and many scouts feel that Wesleyan&#8217;s combination of intellectual depth and athletic grace has led to the development of a number of quarterbacks wearing the red and black, who would surely have dominated the football fields of America if they hadn&#8217;t gone into more scholarly pursuits.  </p>
<p>    So give credit where it is due.  Obama has made a very smart political move by moving into this territory.   He will surely deliver an excellent commencement address, and do his friend Ted a favour while doing it, even if his own elite university background is limited to mainstream Harvard.  But with any luck, the sports journalists will also be there to keep watch over Belichick and Mangini, and to see how Rodgers is running along these days.   Obama can relax in the afterglow of some heavy hitters from the world of sports, whose chumminess would be most        helpful to his popularity among the blue collar working folk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/obama-speaks-at-wesleyan-as-belichick-joins-hall-of-fame-sports-and-politics-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign 2008: Riding the Road of Trivialities</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/campaign-2008-riding-the-road-of-trivialities/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/campaign-2008-riding-the-road-of-trivialities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Politics</category>
	<category>U.S. Foreign Policy</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
	<category>2008</category>
	<category>Election 2008</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/campaign-2008-riding-the-road-of-trivialities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the interminable Democratic campaign for president drags its weary ass along the Trivialities Turnpike it is worth asking how the hell we got on this road to begin with? Serious issues abound – the failed Iraq War, a looming failure in Afghanistan, a weakened NATO unwilling to push the fight in Afghanistan, a weakened [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the interminable Democratic campaign for president drags its weary ass along the Trivialities Turnpike it is worth asking how the hell we got on this road to begin with? Serious issues abound – the failed Iraq War, a looming failure in Afghanistan, a weakened NATO unwilling to push the fight in Afghanistan, a weakened American military, a dollar in the proverbial toilet, an enormous budget deficit, a looming or actual recession, shortfalls in Medicare and Social Security, rampant international distrust of the United States, a non-existent Middle East policy – and the list goes on.</p>
<p>And what are we being fed by the media? John McCain’s barbecue menu and the great spitball fight between Senators Clinton and Obama. The press moves from spitball to spitball, manufacturing intensity on fundamentally trivial issues. They capture the public’s interest and create temporary shifts in polls that then feed the horse race mentality of a press unable to focus on the real issues that determine the state of the world and of America’s declining quality of life. Do we really care all that much that Geraldine Ferraro thinks Senator Obama is “lucky to be black?” Or that Senator Obama’s former Pastor has said some stupid things mixed in with a justifiable rage over much of what America has done to blacks for over 200 years? Or whether Bill Clinton plays his typical cheap tricks? Are those the only kind of issues that can capture the American peoples’ attention? Are we really so ignorant of the world or so lazy that we cannot put the effort into thinking about serious issues and identifying trivialities for what they are? Or have we simply turned it all over to a shallow, irresponsible press?</p>
<p>For a lengthier and stronger look at these concerns see Matt Taibbi’s latest piece on his website: <a href="http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/13696"><strong>The Smirking Chimp</strong></a> – here is a taste:</p>
<blockquote><p>We can&#8217;t focus for more than ten seconds on anything at all and we&#8217;re constantly exercised about stupid media-generated non-scandals, guilt-by-association raps, accidental dumb utterances of various campaign aides and other nonsense — while at the same time we have no energy at all left to wonder about the mass burgling of the national budget for phony military contracts, the war, the billion dollars or so in campaign contributions to be spent this year that will be buying a small mountain of favors for the next four years. – Matt Taibbi</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/campaign-2008-riding-the-road-of-trivialities/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Clemens’ Theater of the Absurd</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/roger-clemens%e2%80%99-theater-of-the-absurd/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/roger-clemens%e2%80%99-theater-of-the-absurd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Politics</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2008/roger-clemens%e2%80%99-theater-of-the-absurd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone needs performance enhancing drugs, it is the Republican members of the U.S. Congress. In an exhibition befitting Little Leaguers, the House Oversight &#038; Govt. Reform Committee managed to turn a hearing on illegal use of steroids by baseball players into theater of the absurd.
Steroid use is a serious issue at least partly because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone needs performance enhancing drugs, it is the Republican members of the U.S. Congress. In an exhibition befitting Little Leaguers, the House Oversight &#038; Govt. Reform Committee managed to turn a hearing on illegal use of steroids by baseball players into theater of the absurd.</p>
<p>Steroid use is a serious issue at least partly because of its effects on those young athletes – high school age and younger -  trying to gain an edge by using drugs that ultimately can seriously damage their health. By focusing on one player’s presumed guilt the Committee managed to create an opportunity for Republicans to rush to the protection of Clemens, a Bush family friend, and turn a potentially serious discussion into one more GOP generated partisan flackshow.</p>
<p>As for the Hearings – <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021303722.html">Mike Wise in the Washington Post</a> cut quickly to the chase:</p>
<blockquote><p>“As the contradictions kept coming yesterday in the Rayburn House Office Building, Clemens came across as a megalomaniac, a habitual liar and a barrel-chested fraud. The people who believe him now seem to be either paid by Clemens, married to him or in worse denial than the Rocket himself.</p>
<p>He came to Capitol Hill not to swear, under oath, his innocence of being a drug cheat; Clemens came here to show America that the arrogance of the elite athlete has moved beyond our ball fields, universities and clubhouses straight into a witness chair at a congressional hearing.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Those Republican Committee members that attempted to portray Clemens as a hero rather than an egotistical liar were on something but it was decidedly not performance enhancing. They accepted Clemens’ nonsensical testimony without blinking an eye and proved once again that most of a generation of Republican politicians have become T.S. Eliot’s Hollow Men.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are the hollow men<br />
We are the stuffed men<br />
Leaning together<br />
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!<br />
Our dried voices, when<br />
We whisper together<br />
Are quiet and meaningless<br />
As wind in dry grass<br />
Or rats’ feet over broken glass<br />
In our dry cellar&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2008/roger-clemens%e2%80%99-theater-of-the-absurd/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEATH BY FIRE: POLITICS AND TAXES</title>
		<link>http://politicsandpress.com/2007/death-by-fire-politics-and-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://politicsandpress.com/2007/death-by-fire-politics-and-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Iraq</category>
	<category>Economy</category>
	<category>U.S. Foreign Policy</category>
	<category>U.S. Domestic Policy</category>
	<category>Election 2008</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsandpress.com/2007/death-by-fire-politics-and-taxes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fire in Gloucester, Massachusetts last night destroyed an apartment building and a synagogue and killed a 70-year-old disabled man. The fire broke out across the street from the city’s fire station and the initial response was only one fireman at least partially because the department has been understaffed since the city’s voters refused to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fire in Gloucester, Massachusetts last night destroyed an apartment building and a synagogue and killed a 70-year-old disabled man. The fire broke out across the street from the city’s fire station and the initial response was only one fireman at least partially because the department has been understaffed since the city’s voters refused to vote for a tax increase in 2004. Another Gloucester resident died in a fire a year ago when it took 11 minutes to respond because the nearest fire station had been closed for budgetary reasons.</p>
<p>This is not an isolated incident – throughout America voters have opted to reduce the quality of basic services in order to reduce their tax bills. At the same time the federal government has provided huge tax breaks to the wealthy thereby reducing funding for local and statewide services. As governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney consistently bragged about reducing the cost of services in the state by simply reducing their quality. This allows him to take credit for holding the line on taxes but also the blame for deteriorating services throughout the state.</p>
<p>We are a country of bridges that collapse, schools that don’t provide arts education, libraries with reduced hours, lousy train service, spotty public transportation services, deteriorating medical services, etc. According to the United Nations World population Prospects Report the U.S. ranks 32nd in infant mortality behind virtually all Western democracies as well as Cuba, S. Korea, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Japan and Singapore. The country ranks 38th in life expectancy behind such countries as Cuba, Chile, Costa Rica, Malta, Martinique and Japan.</p>
<p>For years politicians have promised lower taxes without mentioning the corresponding guarantee of reduced quality of life for the vast majority of Americans. And the American people have been willingly seduced by the promise of lower taxes while ignoring the ugly reality of what shortsighted policies have produced for coming generations.  We are literally scared into spending trillions on a senseless war in Iraq yet cannot find the resources to fight fires, repair bridges, provide well rounded education to our young and improve health care for all at home.  Shame on us.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://politicsandpress.com/2007/death-by-fire-politics-and-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
