• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Politics and Press

The interaction of the press and politics; public diplomacy, and daily absurdities.

  • Blog
  • About
  • The North Korea Conundrum

Supreme Court

THE 2014 REPUBLICAN “SUCCESS”

November 9, 2014 By Jeff

The Republican “long game” of demonizing the President which began immediately after Barak Obama was elected president in 2008 has finally crossed the finish line. Vowing to do anything to destroy Obama’s presidency, the Republicans and their Tea Party sub-contractor began the process of character assassination that culminated in this week’s midterm elections. The strategy put the political future of the likes of Mitch McConnell and John Boehner ahead of the needs of the country and therefore out of necessity had to ignore anything positive that might attach itself to the Obama presidency.

It is not surprising that much of the press largely played along with the story line, broadcasting Boehner and McConnell’s daily banalities after having given credibility to political hacks like Michelle Bachman, Donald Trump, Rick Santorum and pizza maker Herman Cain in 2012.

But hapless Democratic candidates were complicit in their own downfall by running away from Obama and simply ignoring anything positive in his record.

When Obama’s presidency began the United States was a living horror show, largely produced by Republicans. The country had wasted up to $3 trillion on a war fought over weapons of mass destruction that did not exist; it had allowed investment banks to run wild while bringing the American economy to its knees; the American stock market lost 54% of its value in the 2007-08 crash; unemployment soared to over 10% and thousands of homeowners lost their homes through foreclosure – or by simply walking away from suddenly wildly overvalued property. President George Bush’s last budget – for FY 2009 had a deficit of $1,412 billion. After six years of the Obama presidency the annual budget deficit ($483 Bn) is less than a third of Bush’s last deficit, unemployment is at a rate less than half of the 2009 rate, the stock market is at record highs, the housing market has largely recovered, housing foreclosures are at historic lows and the American economy has recovered better than any other Western country’s.

So why have the Democrats suffered such a huge loss?

MONEY: When the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are people and that their money is a form of free speech an already lopsided election funding process became a game of craps played with loaded dice. It has become almost impossible to gauge the amount of money spent on elections but one estimate is that some $4B was spent on the 2014 midterms. Anyone trapped in front of a TV in October must have believed that they were faced with voting for either a swine or a hog.

SUPREME COURT: the U.S. Supreme Court has managed to play a powerful (and perhaps inappropriate) role in politics with its Citizens-United decision opening up funding of election campaigns to corporations and unions, and has decided that protection of voting rights is no longer needed despite the efforts of Republicans to make voting more difficult by requiring photo IDs at the polls despite virtually no evidence of voter fraud in the past.

THE PRESS: The American mainstream press has always been susceptible to the temptations of closeness to power, giving us what amounts to a courtier press. The Sunday talk shows wheel out the same tired lineup week after week: John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Peggy Noonan, Reince Priebus, etc. and they become insider clubs with little difference between the reporters and the politicians. Print journalists have become an endangered species and cable news stations are uniformly tedious – even stupid – , pumping up non stories like the so-called ebola threat and refusing to do the hard work of journalism.

DEMOCRATS’ INEPTITUDE: The Democrats seem to have drunk the Republicans kool aid. They ran away from Obama’s (and their own) accomplishments, refused to defend the Affordable Care Act, never developed a positive message, ignored the positive economic record of Obama’s administration, and did not force the Republicans to defend economic policies that have favored the wealthy at the expense of the poor and middle class. They allowed the Republicans to determine and control the narrative and refused to risk losing on Democratic party principles. Turns out they could hardly have done worse and could at least have looked at themselves in the mirror the day after the election had they stood strongly for something positive.

OBAMA’S PASSIVITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE INCOMPETENCE: The President’s noted rational approach to governing could only work if it was supported by energy or, better yet, passion – for what he is trying to accomplish. His inability- perhaps unwillingness – to sell the Affordable Care Act to his clients (all of us) is an example of a failure of politics. The ACA has been vilified by the Republicans largely by their lying about it. Death panels, free abortions, increased deficits, etc. ad nauseum. The administration never fought back effectively and in fact, by losing control over the development of the ACA website, created a nightmare for themselves – to say nothing of the people who tried to sign up for health insurance. The apparent unwillingness to play the hard politics that end up being a necessary part of the job contributed to giving the Republicans control of the narrative for the election.

VOTERS’ GENERALiZABLE ANGER: Americans are understandably pissed off. They saw their lives seriously disrupted by the recession of 2008-9, then saw bankers bailed out with taxpayers’ money, bank executives raking in record multimillion dollar rewards for incompetence while they were losing their jobs and homes. The rich do indeed get richer and the poor do indeed suck wind. So they looked around and – helped enormously by Republican money and ads demonizing Obama – decided to blame the President. Is that stupid? well yeah. Is it unexpected? well no. The hard work of figuring out what actually happened in the absence of a strong and honest press turns out to be beyond the capabilities of the American people. Or at least – so it seems.

So we come to the future and as our friend Leonard Cohen says, “I have seen the future brother: and it is murder”. And so it will be: possibly death to health care for all, more insane U.S.wars in places with little or no relation to our national interest; greater wealth to the oligarchs; less for the poor; no hope for immigrants; and a fundamental national commitment to all that works agains the interests of the vast majority of the American people. It is our democracy. Love it. Embrace it. Or work to change it.

Filed Under: Economy, Election, Obama, Politics, Press, Supreme Court, U.S. Domestic Policy

America’s Road to Oligarchy

November 12, 2013 By Jeff

Chris Christie was all over the Sunday talk shows and the national press/media after his re-election as Governor of New Jersey, supposedly all but ensuring his nomination – or anointment – as Republican nominee for President in 2016. Time Magazine went so far as to put him on the cover under the oh-so-clever title: “The Elephant in the Room”. Then a piece in the New Republic comes along pursuing the possibility of Elizabeth Warren capsizing the USS Hillary in the race for the Democratic nomination. But, it seems to me to be waaay premature to be worrying about the candidates for 2016; too much can happen between now and then and in some ways the 2014 congressional elections may be more important, especially for domestic policies.

While Christie will have his detractors – both within and outside the Republican party – Clinton and Warren would likely be presented as polarizing figures. But it seems that any candidate for the Democratic party inevitably becomes a polarizing figure because the system  is broken.

We are a country moving in an almost inexorable way toward oligarchy with the help of the current Supreme Court, people like the Koch brothers, major financial institutions and international corporations.  While Bill Clinton was able to raise a lot of money from Wall Street his presidency was under the most vicious kind of attack from day one of his presidency, with the complicity of a mediocre press and a well-financed right-wing hate machine. The same has happened to Obama and would most certainly also happen to Hillary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren.

The combination of an electorate unable to identify their own interests let alone vote for them, a courtier press unable to extricate itself from the ordinary thinking that dominates political discussion in America, the corrupting influence of money and the breakdown of Americans’ commitment to the common good has led to a broken country. Warren understands this and her candidacy would be welcome simply to get some very basic political issues on the table. But first, let’s see if the Democratic Party can figure out how to win back the House of Representatives in 2014. Not that I am especially hopeful.

Filed Under: Chris Christie, Elizabeth Warren, Hillary Clintom, Politics, Press, Supreme Court, U.S. Domestic Policy

Primary Sidebar

Categories:

  • 2008 (3)
  • abortion (1)
  • Afghanistan (8)
  • Africa (6)
  • Baseball (1)
  • Bobby Jindal (1)
  • Bush/Cheney (6)
  • Canada (93)
  • Carly Fiorina (1)
  • China (9)
  • Chris Christie (1)
  • Collective Bargaining (2)
  • DARFUR (10)
  • Ebola (1)
  • Economy (30)
  • Education (2)
  • Election (16)
  • Election 2008 (35)
  • Elizabeth Warren (1)
  • Employment (1)
  • Environment (14)
  • Erdogan (4)
  • Europe (52)
  • Free Speech (4)
  • Genocide (11)
  • Germany (52)
  • Global Warming (6)
  • Greece (3)
  • Healthcare (12)
  • Hillary Clintom (2)
  • Huckabee (1)
  • Human Rights (9)
  • Immigration (9)
  • Inauguration (1)
  • internatinal Livability (2)
  • International Broadcasting (20)
  • Iran (35)
  • Iraq (62)
  • Israel (4)
  • Labor (1)
  • Lieberman Watch (7)
  • McCain (17)
  • Merkel (4)
  • Middle East (14)
  • NATO (1)
  • nelson (1)
  • North Korea (7)
  • Obama (29)
  • Pakistan (3)
  • Palin (12)
  • PBS NEWSHOUR (1)
  • Police (1)
  • Police brutality (1)
  • Politics (121)
  • Press (126)
  • Public Diplomacy (24)
  • Racism (3)
  • Republican Party (21)
  • Robert Byrd (1)
  • Romney (4)
  • Romney (1)
  • Russia (27)
  • Sports (23)
  • Supreme Copurt (1)
  • Supreme Court (2)
  • syria (3)
  • Taxes (3)
  • Tea Party (8)
  • Terrorism (22)
  • The Bush Watch (3)
  • TRUMP (17)
  • Turkey (7)
  • U.S. Domestic Policy (68)
  • U.S. Foreign Policy (110)
  • Ukraine (3)
  • Uncategorized (158)
  • William Barr (2)
  • Wisconsin Governor (2)

Archives:

  • September 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (3)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (4)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (2)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • October 2014 (2)
  • September 2014 (3)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (1)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (1)
  • December 2013 (1)
  • November 2013 (4)
  • October 2013 (1)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • February 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (1)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • July 2012 (2)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • May 2012 (4)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (2)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (2)
  • November 2011 (3)
  • October 2011 (1)
  • September 2011 (3)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • June 2011 (3)
  • May 2011 (1)
  • April 2011 (2)
  • March 2011 (3)
  • February 2011 (4)
  • January 2011 (3)
  • December 2010 (3)
  • November 2010 (1)
  • October 2010 (1)
  • September 2010 (3)
  • August 2010 (3)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • June 2010 (3)
  • May 2010 (3)
  • April 2010 (2)
  • March 2010 (3)
  • February 2010 (4)
  • January 2010 (5)
  • December 2009 (7)
  • November 2009 (3)
  • October 2009 (1)
  • September 2009 (4)
  • August 2009 (2)
  • July 2009 (4)
  • June 2009 (3)
  • May 2009 (3)
  • April 2009 (4)
  • March 2009 (4)
  • February 2009 (4)
  • January 2009 (5)
  • December 2008 (3)
  • November 2008 (3)
  • October 2008 (5)
  • September 2008 (7)
  • August 2008 (5)
  • July 2008 (4)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (2)
  • April 2008 (6)
  • March 2008 (2)
  • February 2008 (4)
  • January 2008 (4)
  • December 2007 (5)
  • November 2007 (6)
  • October 2007 (5)
  • September 2007 (5)
  • August 2007 (7)
  • July 2007 (6)
  • June 2007 (12)
  • May 2007 (7)
  • April 2007 (9)
  • March 2007 (13)
  • February 2007 (12)
  • January 2007 (17)
  • December 2006 (7)
  • November 2006 (26)
  • October 2006 (36)
  • September 2006 (19)
  • August 2006 (6)

Environment

  • Treehugger

General: culture, politics, etc.

  • Sign and Sight
  • Slate Magazine
  • The Christopher Hitchens Web

international Affairs

  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • New York Review of Books

Politics

  • Daily Dish
  • Rolling Stone National Affairs Daily
  • The Hotline
  • The writings of Matt Taibbi
  • TPM Cafe

Public Diplomacy

  • USC Center on Public Diplomacy